top of page

The Job of the Crocodile!

The Spawning Ordeal and the Death of River Abundance.

 

The spawning run is, without question, a sacrificial rite. The prevailing understanding is that for most, it is a final act. However, the data I have accrued through decades of hands-on experience suggests a crucial part of the equation often overlooked; namely, population density. 

The number of salmon that survive the spawning ordeal and make it back to the sea is not a static figure; it is a dynamic indicator of the health and abundance of the run itself. 


A 17 Pound Cock Fish will die after spawning
A 17 Pound Cock Fish will die after spawning

When Abundance Reigned (e.g., The Spey in the Mid-80s): In times when the river was "properly stocked" and when runs exceeding 100,000 fish, the survival rate of the parent fish was crushingly low. As many as 90% of female salmon perished and for males, a staggering 99.9% died. 

In these years of plenty, the sacrificial role of the parent fish—to die, rot, and feed the next generation—was fulfilled completely. The river, teeming with life, and could absorb this enormous biological contribution. However, when Numbers Collapse (e.g., Drought Years like 2018)! In years where the run is pitifully small, perhaps less than 10,000 fish, the fish themselves appear to "know" a higher survival rate is necessary to keep the species viable, so they adapt! Female survival drastically shifts, with possibly 30% or even more, females successfully making it back to the ocean to run the gauntlet another time. In the past, with less seal and Dolphin predation, those important Multi Spawners will have made up between 4 and 7% of the following years spawning fish. Now this is 0.1 at best!   

What does the above tell us? In every part of its lifecycle, without abundance, the species struggles. The ecosystem, running on a minimal calorie budget, cannot afford to lose as many breeders as it has over the past number of years. They push for survival because the critical mass for self-sustainability has been lost. 

Abundance Feeds Abundance 

The deeply held notion, a concept mirrored in the traditions of Native or "First Nation" people—who ceremonially return the first salmon to the river—is that the parent fish must die to feed the next generation. 

Survivors are known as "kelts, however, the decomposing bodies of dead spawned-out salmon, " are the vital nutrient supply for the river. They are the protein, the fat, and the essential minerals that dramatically boost the food chain. 

 The idea that a river's capacity is fixed and can only hold a certain number of fish—the "maximum carrying capacity" mantra pushed by some modern managers—is utterly ludicrous. The output of any river is fundamentally dictated by its food supply, not some arbitrary density formula, but this made for great reading for those who were interested, but simply didn't know. A succession of Fishery Board Chairmen were perfect examples of this.   

Abundance in adults creates abundance in juveniles. The correlation is simple, observable, and confirmed by those who have spent their lives on the riverbanks. 


Myself with Sandy Smith, Sandy Milne. We spent our whole life working on and observing the river.
Myself with Sandy Smith, Sandy Milne. We spent our whole life working on and observing the river.

The Failure of Modern Management 

My memory of burying 50 to 100 dead salmon daily in the 80s speaks to an abundance that modern fishery biologists, most of whom at that time were then in primary school, simply failed to grasp. Their perception of a "healthy" river was formed after the crash, resulting in a distorted, diminished baseline. 

The catastrophic error lies in the scientific insistence that a small number of adults is "enough" to produce a viable number of juveniles. This misguided faith in "just enough," over the reality of "abundance," has been a monumental failure for the species. Density Dependence is related to food and, in this instance, food is related to adult numbers and size of floods.

Wrapped up in their own egos and relying on abstract formulas such as the Zippin, back in the 90s, these individuals produced very well written but flawed documents, dismissing the real-world, ground-level observations of the ghillies and river keepers. At this time they claimed rivers “had enough” and operating at "maximum carrying capacity" when, in fact, what was obvious to the experienced trained eye, the system was starving. 

In a scramble to correct this profound failure, modern fishery managers have used methods such as trying to artificially fertilise the River Dee's burns with deer carcasses, a desperate measure taken far too late. The damage was done, the burn in question was now down to two adults. Its sad, that it was ever left to go this far.  

The evidence presented by decades of direct, on-the-water observation is clear - Atlantic salmon is a species built on the principle of over-abundance. Any management strategy that ignores this fundamental truth—and the vital, visceral role of the dead fish in feeding the river's output, has been, and is a dereliction of duty and a direct cause of the current crisis. The simplistic "maximum carrying capacity" dogma deserves to be trashed, and those who championed it should be held accountable for confusing and failing a generation of fishery management. 

And if you think this is bad, don’t get me started on Population Dynamics in the Ocean!!! 

 
 
 

11 Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating

Hi Ian

Forgive me if this seems obvious, but given that fish stocks in all Scottish rivers have declined dramatically since, say, the 80s (something I’ve noticed myself while fishing on the Spey, Tay, and Tweed), it seems logical to conclude that the main issue lies out at sea, rather than within individual river systems. Setting climate change aside for a moment, the marine environment is the common factor in the Atlantic salmon’s life cycle, regardless of which river the fish come from.


If the problem were specific to individual rivers, we’d expect to see varying levels of decline — a clear correlation between factors such as water quality, pollution, or predator numbers, and the corresponding fish populations. In that…

Like
Replying to

Hi David, for sure, once salmon reach Parr stage, the main loss of salmon overall lies in the ocean. I will cover this comprehensively in another blog but basically, man is the main problem, not climate variation or anything associated with this. Salmon have the ability to adapt, sometimes not quickly, but over a period of years, they will adapt to anything nature throws at them. As soon as you add man, in the form of netting at either end of their migration then you have a problem. UDN came along at the same time as fish caught by the Greenlanders peaked. I'm sure it was around 1968. The species have never recovered properly from this. However, thats not where…

Like

I’m not sure if I can agree with these first few paras. Looking at the all-method ( AM ) catch stats for Tweed/ Tay the other day, c 1952 to 1975, they show that for each river the AM catch for each around 1970 was 100k. But the rod catches were very low in comparison suggesting there is a flaw in your argument if it can be accepted that, in most years, rod catches can point to spawning numbers. So, year after year, it appears that a good crop can be taken until UDN intervened c 1968 and affected in-river stocks mainly.

E.G. the Varzuga in the Kola was netted comprehensively on alternate days by operating a trap/s in…


Like
Replying to

Regarding the Ghillies juvenile counts. At the time I allude to in the article 1990s, we had no juvenile surveys on the river, just what the ghillies saw, and my point then and now was what they saw was the same, but very different from those who came from their cosy office 100 miles away to tell us, via some formula, that all was fine. I 100% agree with you about the damaging of headwaters, pollution, dams etc, etc. This has been ignored and not properly understood for a long time and all part of the rivers inability to produce the max number of Juvenile fish, which in turn has a major impact when they reach the ocean.

Like

Your article has prompted me to ask, what, exactly, does the Spey Fishery Board do, and what does it do specifically to help with the revival of the Spey in a day to day practical way?

Like
Replying to

The remit is to protect and enhance salmon within the catchment. To be frank its out dated and made up of people who find it difficult to come to conclusions about anything much at all. Just my view.

Like
bottom of page