top of page

The Cry of the Salmon - A History of our Betrayal

To understand the salmon's modern crisis, we must look backward to a time when its numbers were so staggering they were a fact of everyday life, not a conservation project. The Atlantic salmon was not merely a fish; it was a pillar of the ecosystem, a cultural icon, and a source of sustenance that shaped societies. Its demise is a testament to human determination, not to save it, but to consume it into oblivion. 

For centuries, the rivers of Europe, from the smallest streams in England to the great waterways of France and Germany, were highways for an unimaginable biomass of juvenile salmon. The ocean ecosystem relied on this colossal output. Think of the millions upon millions of salmon smolts, a silvery, shimmering feast for larger fish, birds, and marine mammals. This was the "normal" situation. Today, that number has collapsed, a ghost of its former self, representing a pitiful fraction of that historical abundance. The ripple effect of this loss, in both freshwater and marine environments, is a void we are only beginning to comprehend. 

Spey Superintendent Jimmy Grey on his retirment, with myself and Phones Ghillie, Sandy Smith
Spey Superintendent Jimmy Grey on his retirment, with myself and Phones Ghillie, Sandy Smith

The historical accounts are chillingly prescient. As early as the 1860s, the great writer Charles Dickens sounded an alarm. In his works, he spoke of the once-plentiful salmon becoming "extinct" from English rivers—a prophecy that would tragically come true in many places. The Industrial Revolution had begun its grim work, and with it, the relentless persecution of the species intensified. Historical records show salmon fry and parr were not just a food source but a commodity, harvested by the bushel to be sold as "sprats" or even used as fertiliser, such was their abundance. This was not a local practice; it reflected a mindset that saw the natural world as an endless resource for human exploitation. The stories of my youth, of people catching dozens of juvenile sea trout in an evening to dig into their rose beds, were not isolated anecdotes—they were the dying echo of a destructive tradition that had been commonplace for generations. 

The salmon's resilience was built on abundance, on the sheer power of its numbers. Once this biomass dropped below a critical threshold, the doom of the population was sealed. This pattern is not theoretical; it is etched into the history of nearly every European country. In the 18th and 19th centuries, salmon were so prolific in Spain, France, and Germany that they were a significant part of the culture. They were the food of the serf, so common that apprentices famously demanded contracts specifying they wouldn’t be fed salmon more than a few times a week. Yet, within two generations of Europeans, this culturally important fish became nothing more than a memory. It was no longer politically important; thus, the species lost its once powerful voice. Think of present-day Scotland and how important the iconic King of Fish now is to the everyday Scot? More than anything else, this has sealed its fate.  

The causes have all been man-made, a relentless assault on the species from all angles: 

  • Dams and Pollution - The Industrial Revolution brought with it impassable dams and poisoned rivers, suffocating the salmon's lifecycle. 

  • Water Abstraction - As populations grew, so did the need for water, diverting essential river flow and leaving salmon stranded. 

  • Over-Exploitation - As the salmon became scarcer, its value rose. It transitioned from the food of the poor to a luxury item, making it an even more desirable target for netting and poaching. The last salmon caught in London's River Thames in the 1820s was bought by the King for a Guinea per pound—a stark illustration of this shift. 

  • Decreasing Political Support 

Today, we are left with a legacy of well-intentioned but often misguided conservation efforts. The discussion is filled with talk of beavers and tree planting, while the historical causes—the dams, the pollution, abstraction, over population and relentless over-exploitation, still, are allowed to persist. We spend vast resources on finding "answers" that have been staring us in the face for centuries. The truth is that the king of fish has been demoted in the public consciousness. To the average person, it is a wild, iconic creature of the river, that jumps out of the river arriving in the Supermarket as a cellophane-wrapped fillet. This is the sad reality. No amount of stocking or localised protection can reverse the tide of history. We are watching the final act of a slow-motion extinction [certainly commercially] that began hundreds of years ago, a story of man's fatal determination to exterminate a species that was, for a time, a symbol of everything wild and abundant. 

 

The Unthinkable Question - Will the Salmon Ever Go Extinct? 

Given the stark historical data and the current state of Europe's rivers, a critical question hangs in the air - Will the Atlantic salmon ever truly disappear? 

The short answer is likely no. Despite centuries of human pressure, salmon populations have shown a remarkable resilience. Even in rivers across France, Spain, and Germany where they were once abundant and are now functionally absent from a commercial standpoint, a few fish still manage to survive. This suggests that even at incredibly low numbers, the species can cling to existence. 

However, this is not a cause for celebration. We have successfully decimated the salmon as a natural food source. The historical biomass of juveniles leaving Europe’s rivers—once incalculably vast—is now estimated at only 1-2% of what it once was. The salmon has gone from a culturally important, staple diet of millions, to something only valuable as a sport fishery. How sad is this.? The most amazing source of protein, extremely healthy, to a plaything. However, without this sport fishery we may already have none.  

But for how long can this last?  

The story of England's River Tyne offers a glimmer of hope. In the mid-20th century, the Tyne was a polluted, lifeless river, and its once-prolific salmon run was commercially extinct. Through a concerted effort to clean up pollutants and a well-managed hatchery program to mitigate the loss of natural spawning habitat, the river was reborn. The salmon run, which had dwindled to nothing, rebounded so dramatically that the Tyne became England's top salmon sport fishing river, with adult numbers topping 6000 salmon caught by rod and line. A far cry from the 130,000 present in that river during pre-industrial times, but nevertheless, something positive with the potential to provide many rural jobs and lots of tourism income.  

This success story proves a vital point; with the right management and a genuine commitment to conservation, we can bring salmon populations back to levels that are viable as sport fisheries. While we will never see the incomprehensible numbers of salmon that existed before the Industrial Revolution, we can restore them to many rivers that are now devoid of the species. The byproduct of such a monumental effort would be a significant increase in the number of juvenile salmon returning to the sea, a small but crucial step toward restoring the balance we so carelessly disrupted.  

The Atlantic salmon isn't just a fish for kings and lords; it's the fish of the people. Its story isn't one of luxury, but of survival—a tale that belongs to all of us. For generations, this iconic creature has been a symbol of our shared rivers and our shared heritage. But we've allowed that story to fade, just as it has in so many other parts of Europe. 

It's time to remember who the salmon truly belongs to. We have failed this magnificent creature. We have polluted its waters, blocked its paths, and pushed it to the brink of extinction. Now, in its hour of greatest need, it is our duty to act. The fate of the Atlantic salmon rests not in the hands of a few, but in the hearts of us all. Let's reclaim its story and give this king of the waters the chance it deserves to reclaim its home. 

 

 

 
 
 

11 Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating

Personally I think so too. I think all the 100s of millions wasted on pointless research should be spent on ensuring all rivers with no salmon that once had, are producing maximum smolt numbers to the sea.

Like

mjdew27
Aug 06

What a sad state of affairs. Can we really be so stupid? (looking at our current politicians) the answer has to be “yes”. How do we get them (and the powers that be on the rivers) to recognise how valuable the salmon fishing fraternity are to the Scottish (and European) economy? We (my wife and I) have fished for 5 x weeks solid on the best beats on the best rivers in Scotland this spring and had 1 x fish between us. It was a wonderful special moment when it happened but hard fought. Fisheries will have to adjust the pricing structure to recognise the lack of fish but fishery bodies (and governments) will have to act to deal with…

Like
Replying to

Unfortunately we are a country full of people happy with the Status Quo. Closing the door after the horse has bolted is part of our culture, as is the, "I'm alright so bugger you" trait. Fishery owners are delighted their "pathetic piss poor" income [ it could and should be so much better], because they have no idea of the true value of what they own. It's all run by people who's ideas died in the last century and have not a clue about how to move the sector forward. This is not to say that "all" salmon fishing should be more expensive; far from it, It just needs a complete rethink based on where it is today. I see…

Like

MagicFly.
MagicFly.
Aug 06

Great article Ian, so sad that we happen to be around just as it's all nearly finished. It's like the Severn, an old pal of mine , Dick Cash, worked on one of the salmon nets on the Severn at Tewkesbury in the 1920's. In those days , legal nets were in operation near all the lower river weirs , Upper Lode, Diglis, Holt, Bevere and Lincomb. Also there were many types of nets operating in the estuary, draught nets, lave nets, stop boats and putcher weirs. Catching thousands of salmon per year. This year , to my knowledge less than 10 salmon have been caught on rod and line on the whole river....this despite £20 million being spe…

Like
Replying to

This is absolutely indicative of people being paid buy public money to simply tick boxes and not give a flying ++++

Like

The 130k is a somewhat questionable figure for kelts, sea-trout and Scottish fish ( mainly Tweed ) were all bunched together in the catch stats. The figures were for the Tyne area which had c 15 miles of coast included in the era you comment upon.

Thanks kindly Ian for the link to Bob’s work. I have followed this from time-to-time. I know a few west coast rivers up there where steep gradients cause gravel washout and Vibert Boxes were used in the distant past as a cure.

As for the Spey, anything which interes with natural selection alters genetics. Thus I’m surprised that it’s now thought that artificial help will improve matters. We’ll see in c 5…

Like
Replying to

They tried those boxes in Canada back in the 90s too. By this time the rot had set in here and rivers no longer producing enough to offset the huge rise in predators. Much the same as here. Yes, you're 100% right regarding the Spey hatchery, it will fail for sure because it will be designed to fail. Until they get people with a proven track record in this field [I'd suggest a friend from Iceland] then it will fail for sure.

Like

Excellent article. Dozens of small West coast rivers some that had substantial runs including big MSW fish are now empty of Salmon. There appears to be no collective will to redress this as they never really had commercial value. The commercial value was in the dozens of bag net stations. While Salmon farming is a major factor in smolt mortality there are clearly other factors. There is a wild salmon fund but as it's funding from the Salmon farm industry few would go near it, including me. Unless you go cap in hand to Mowi there is no hatchery available to bank the genes of these unique fish from the smaller rivers and no way of holding out for change.…

Edited
Like
Replying to

I'm sure a better relationship between the wild fish and Aquaculture sector will, in the future, come up with a form of a solution. Unfortunately at this time we are still in the "shouting and swearing at one another" part of this inevitable cycle. History tells us that nothing positive ever comes at this stage. Only once we begin talking and "trying" to understand one another's needs and requirements do civilised societies ever make progress. I only hope that the Aquaculture industry and their supporters don't decide to turn on Salmon Fishing. It's such an easy and fragile target for them right now. Aquaculture as it stands is a dirty industry with so many negatives attached to it, one of…

Like
bottom of page